News and Products

Deep learning approach differentiates small renal masses on multiphase CT

A deep learning method with a convolutional neural network (CNN) can support the evaluation of small solid renal masses in dynamic CT images with acceptable diagnostic performance, according to a recent article (Tanaka T et el. Differentiation of Small (≤ 4 cm) Renal Masses on Multiphase Contrast-Enhanced CT by Deep Learning. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2020 Mar;214(3):605-612. doi: 10.2214/AJR.19.22074.).

Between 2012 and 2016, researchers at Japan’s Okayama University studied 1807 image sets from 168 pathologically diagnosed small (<4 cm) solid renal masses with four CT phases —  unenhanced, corticomedullary, nephrogenic, and excretory — in 159 patients. Masses were classified as malignant (n = 136) or benign (n = 32) using a 5-point scale, and this dataset was then randomly divided into five subsets.

As lead author Takashi Tanaka explained, “four were used for augmentation and supervised training (48,832 images), and one was used for testing (281 images).”

Utilizing the Inception-v3 architecture CNN model, the AUC for malignancy and accuracy at optimal cutoff values of output data were evaluated in six different CNN models.

Finding no significant size difference between malignant and benign lesions, Tanaka’s team did find that the Aarea Under the Curve (AUC) value of the corticomedullary phase was higher than that of other phases (corticomedullary vs excretory, p = 0.022).

Additionally, the highest accuracy (88%) was achieved in the corticomedullary phase images.

Multivariate analysis revealed that the CNN model of corticomedullary phase was thus a significant predictor for malignancy, “compared with other CNN models, age, sex, and lesion size,” Tanaka concluded.

 

Corticomedullary phase showed a small solid renal mass  in a 41-year-old woman with 2.6-cm solid renal mass that was pathologically diagnosed as angiomyolipoma after biopsy. The mass was  correctly diagnosed as benign lesion by CMP convolutional neural network (CNN) model but not by other CNN models. Two radiologist readers incorrectly determined the small solid renal mass to be malignant (4 and 5 on 5-point scale, respectively). Image credit

American Journal of Roentgenology (AJR)